Amazon's Barbarians at Bill Gates Nation: Foundation Step Aside Melinda you've been Surpassed by ...
Pioneering American philanthropist Andrew Carnegie once set the standard for giving back: "No man can become rich without himself enriching others," he said. "The man who dies rich dies disgraced."
Scores of the world's wealthiest people have taken to his philosophy, donating their riches to hundreds of causes.
When Google.org announced $50 million in workforce development grants this August, it called the effort its largest giving initiative to date, together with an earlier $50 million grant to close the global education gap. The combined sum, $100 million, is hardly chump change, but now, the tech giant has upped the ante once again. CEO Sundar Pichai recently illuminated the company’s philanthropic game plan and set a bold target: $1 billion in nonprofit grants over the next five years centered on education, economic opportunity, and inclusion.
Just last week, Warren Buffett gave $2.8 billion in Berkshire preferred stock to 5 charities, with the overwhelming majority of that money progressing to the Gates Foundation. Buffett is consistent to follow through on the Giving Pledge that he and Gates launched in 2010, encouraging wealthy people and families to give most of their wealth to charity. Buffett has currently given nearly $23 billion of his fortune. However, Gates leads the means in total charitable giving with $28 billion.
In reviewing the list of these individuals that have signed the Giving Pledge, one can realize a prolonged compendium of far-famed entrepreneurs—many from the technical school industry: Mark Zuckerberg, Pierre Omidyar, Elon Musk, Larry Ellison, Paul Allen, Reed Hastings, Dustin Moskovitz, and a variety of technical entrepreneurs have signed; however, one of the perceptibly absent names from that list is Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
Amazon founder Jeff Bezos who comes from Wall Street started with the website domain name called "relentless".com before it was called Amazon (no joke) surpassed Bill Gates in July to become not only the world’s richest man, but the richest person in the world with an estimated net worth of $90.6 billion.
This has been a big year for Amazon, and in turn, which bought Whole Foods on June 16 and also had a record-breaking Amazon Prime Day.
Bezos, who bought The Washington Post in 2013 for $250 million, owns about 17% of Amazon.com, which is part of what buoyed him to be the world’s richest man.
Amazon’s stocks surged ahead of the online retail giant’s quarterly earnings report, adding at least $1 billion to Bezo’s overall net worth. Although as a result of Bezos fortune over the years he's proved that he’s not terribly adept at charity or of treating his employee fairly or with quality.
Leading edge companies Facebook, Google , Linked In, Adobe (4 of 10 which fall in the top ten of the big bluechips out of every sector) have led the pack as the best places to work/ most generous - which tells us something about Tech's power in terms of its 10% growth in the sector this year.
Microsoft and Amazon are corporations closely known as extensions of their founders’ personalities, and once it involves philanthropic giving, that mostly looks to be the case. Each corporations is situated within the Seattle space, along side different high profile firms, like Starbucks, Costco, and Boeing. However among this cluster, it’s Amazon that's singled out domestically for the shortage of support it provides the community.
The Seattle Times printed a prolonged profile in early 2012 that featured the voices of the many community and charity leaders disgruntled with Amazon’s lack of involvement. One major difference in the community, Amazon, is usually missing in action also in its involvement in charitable giving. .
Even one in every of Amazon’s high charitable initiatives, AmazonSmile, has moon-faced criticism for its ineffectualness. Amazon offers to convey zero. 5% of any purchase to a charity of one’s choice. In a sense, customers will feel smart concerning shopping for a lot of from Amazon, despite the fact that the total given is paltry. however from the stance of social exchange theory, this interaction, which inspires larger purchases, conjointly discourages charitable giving from the patrons themselves.
Microsoft, for its half, has given $6.5 billion since 1983 in money, services, and code to non-profits round the world. the corporate matches up to $15,000 annually of any charitable giving from its workers. the corporate even pays charities to let Microsoft workers volunteer. Many Corporations match in the same way up to around 5-15K per year.
Bezos’ personal giving faces the maximum amount criticism as Amazon’s. once Bezos purchased the Washington Post last year, the Post itself noted concern from Steve Delfin, business executive of America’s Charities, that the paper could cut back its philanthropic gift underneath Bezos’ leadership, stating: “Jeff Bezos’s footprint in philanthropic gift is smaller than one may suppose given the dimensions and scope of his personal wealth.” This wasn’t the primary time Bezos and Amazon have faced criticism from a publication related to the corporate he would later purchase. A 2009 article in Slate, that at the time was a part ofidentical company because the Washington Post, was titled, “The New church.” It went thus far on state: “There are lemonade stands that give more to charity” (referencing "Alex’s Lemonade" literally ).
Bezos and Amazon do build some donations. The Seattle Times noted that the corporate has given $1,000-$10,000 to variety of native charities, associated Bezos given $10 million for an innovation center at Seattle’s depository of History & trade and $15 million for a middle at Princeton named when him.
Bezos’ folks, Miguel and Jacqueline, started the Bezos Family Foundation in 2001. however consistent with the nature of his philanthropic way, Jeff Bezos has not contributed any funds to the inspiration.
The newspaper he owns has been extremely critical even of Bezo's. On June 7, a Washington Post newsman printed a 3600 word exposé about Microsoft. The report noted that Gates “bankrolled” and have become “de facto organizer” resulting in “one of the swiftest and most outstanding shifts in education policy in U.S. history.” All the whereas, they need omitted the apparent indisputable fact that their boss – Mr. Bezos – largely opts out of charitable investments.
Milton economic expert, for one, may agree. He wrote in associate oft-quoted NY Times column that “the social responsibility of business is to extend its profits.” Friedman, however, conjointly believed that philanthropic gift had a good social purpose once performed by people, who were, of course, liberal to select.
Gates explained that innovation is driven by non-public enterprise. The Gates Foundation works closely with for-profit pharmaceutical corporations and agricultural corporations, however the inspiration helps motivate innovation and distribution of those product to areas of the planet that otherwise couldn't afford such innovations. it's through the free market, however, that such innovation is feasible.
Technical school titans, Microsoft and Amazon would appear to own a lot of in common, but What's troublesome is Gate's Microsoft was once seen as the bully, capitalist whose Monopoly and greed would change the tech landscape forever - well it did for the better.
Bezo's on the other hand shows little empathy for anything but scaling the company, profits and caring what the board members think about philathropy - just like Steve Jobs. A man who never gave back and whose charm and personality has led to make apple the most profitable company ever and its few top executives and shareholders wealthy - and the rest of us with overpriced under performing phones stuck in the eco system of convenience and comfort.
When I've asked "Why don't you stop buying from Amazon to close family/friends who feel guilty about buying the response was "Well, everyone won't so why should I... plus, they are so convenient." Switch vendors and watch how quickly popular sentiment can change when people talk - after all viral marketing and using Facebook's mantra to connect the world might work after all is said and done for the better post election. Its time we put these platforms to good use - we are hyperconnected, hyper vigilant and news about doing good despite not being a large corporation could mean alot more - its is an energy whose ripple effect could be felt.
Just ask Susan Coulter...
"On their busiest traffic days, Coulter said# the Grab Your Wallet website has recorded as many as 30,000 unique visitors per hour as 23 companies dropped doing business with trump a couple months later when it went viral after the allegations of Trump's sexual misconduct and comments "
10 Things you should know about Wikipedia
(NaturalNews) It is astonishing that the Wikipedia website smears so many thousands of people with false, defamatory information -- celebrities, authors, activists, scientists, journalists and so on -- yet almost no one has published the dubious history of its co-founder, Jimmy Wales.
As part of the background investigation into the Wikipedia smear machine, Natural News has uncovered some truly shocking details about Jimmy Wales and his very questionable character. It turns out that before launching Wikipedia and structuring it as an online defamation engine to defame and slander people he didn't like, Jimmy Wales ran a porn network called Bomis, which sold membership access to pornography.
Wales has apparently gone to great lengths to try to bury what you're about to read here, engaging in some rather dubious revisionist history activities that call into question his personal integrity. The mainstream media, predictably, has gladly colluded in a cover-up of Jimmy Wales' real past by running puff pieces glorifying the man while flatly refusing to conduct any real investigation into his real past. (This is how the media operates today: no real journalism takes place at all.)
If every source listed here is to be believed, Jimmy Wales traded Wikipedia edits for sex by exploiting his editorial position over a female editor, ordered the intimidation and harassment of Wikipedia editors who attempted to maintain a truly "neutral point of view" about Jimmy Wales himself, and exploited his position within the Wikimedia Foundation to attempt to bury details about his own past.
When the truth about Wales' sleazy business activities surfaces from time to time, Wales seems to exploit his control over Wikipedia to delete the information from his own page -- a privilege he absolutely refuses to extend to anyone else so that they might remove negative information from their own namesake pages. Wales sees himself as "King" and everyone else as "Subjects" to be raked over the coals with defamatory content posted by anonymous trolls posing as "editors."
Wikipedia, in other words, has become Jimmy Wales' own private Ministry of Truth where he launches Orwellian-style defamation campaigns against targeted enemies while censoring anyone who attempts to report the truth about himself. It's no coincidence that every person or publication which has spoken out against Jimmy Wales has been viciously slandered on Wikipedia.
So much for that "neutral point of view," huh?
Click here to watch the new video called "10 Shocking Things You Never Knew About Jimmy Wales" (Youtube).
Jimmy Wales got his start with a porn siteAs the following screen capture from Jimmy Wales' "Bomis" venture shows, Wales was making money by selling access to porn:
Wales orders the intimidation or elimination of Wikipedia editors hostile to his own public imageUnder the direction of Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia has meticulously eliminated editors and contributors who have a truly "neutral" point of view while protecting and even promoting the editing privileges of corporate-funded defamation operatives who use Wikipedia to conduct character assassination campaigns of targeted individuals.
Those who are targeted by Wikipedia include political conservatives, health activists as well as healing arts practitioners, authors and naturopaths.
As WND writes in its own story covering Wikipedia's character assassination activities:
WND's [Joseph] Farah has been characterized by Wikipedia as a "Zionist twit and Jew-loving pig," a "known [expletive] sucker," "closet homosexual," "conspiracy theorist," "white supremacist," a "proud member of the Ku Klux Klan," a "religious nutcase" and "a pioneer in the political uses of psychedelics." It also falsely accused Farah of having a romantic affair with a famous conservative female commentator.
According to WND, in 2005, WIRED Magazine reported that:
...Jimmy Wales "repeatedly revised the [Wikipedia] description of a search site he called Bomis, which included a section with adult photos called ‘Bomis Babes.'" Wikipedia had described Bomis Babes as "soft-core pornography," but Wales changed it to "adult content section" and twice removed references to pornography.
WIRED Magazine, apparently practicing the same thing it criticized Wales for doing, has since removed that article from its own website.
Former Jimmy Wales business partner reaches out to Natural News to set the record straightNatural News has made contact with a former business partner of Jimmy Wales who took part in this activity before leaving the company out of disgust.
This business partner, who chooses to remain anonymous out of fear of being targeted by Jimmy Wales, told Natural News that "99% of the Bomis traffic was for porn."
"We all used to commute to work together in Pacific Beach..." he told Natural News. "It really was a sleazy porn ring search engine."
Jimmy Wales, of course, downplays his own history, claiming it was nothing more than "...image galleries of female actresses and so forth." (WIRED)
And herein lies the fundamental "Big Lie" of Wikipedia and Jimmy Wales: This is a man who believes that he and only he has the exclusive right to rewrite his own history, removing negative information he doesn't like and replacing it with a carefully crafted false public image that portrays Wales as some sort of saint. But at the same time, he openly supports Wikipedia publishing utterly false, fabricated and defamatory information about other people, alternative medicine, homeopathy or anything else that Jimmy Wales himself disagrees with.
Wikipedia, in other words, isn't a free encyclopedia created by "thousands of volunteers," as Wales claims. It is actually an extension of the ego-centric psychopathy of a former porn king who now functions as an internet tyrant.
Jimmy Wales seems to be driven by hatred and fear: HATRED for conservative journalists, naturopathic doctors, NLP practitioners, anti-GMO food activists and so on... combined with the FEAR that people might discover who he really is: a sleaze-slinging porn king who has hit the "content jackpot" with Wikipedia and now uses Wikipedia as his own personal content weapon to run slander and defamation campaigns against individuals and philosophies he personally despises.
That's nothing to be proud of. In fact, it's something to be ashamed of. And it makes you wonder: Why would Google and other search engines give Wikipedia so much credibility when, at its core, the website has low credibility because its editors hide behind anonymity? It's no secret that corporations hire editors to alter pages on Wikipedia. Wales surely must be aware of this practice, yet he has done absolutely nothing to stop it.
Fact checking on Wikipedia is optional as a reference section does not include an accuracy score or fact checking section, which could easily be included by cross-referencing citations; however, instead can easily be manipulated by companies (or anyone) with some degree of SEO awareness and inside knowledge on a topic. When will we learn truth is what sets us free in the era of infotainment we will find that life gets better even if the popular consensus is sometimes wrong.
Whats expected of Russian Spies is to open their legs for their mother country if all else flails Malcolm Nance - The Plot To Hack America
Anna Chapman KGB SPY
"During the tail end of his final term, President Barack Obama spoke with Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg about the growing prevalence of so-called fake news and its effect on the political landscape. As reported by the Washington Post, Zuckerberg initially rebuffed claims of news postings with false slants and told Obama that the issue was essentially overblown.
For months leading up to the vote, Obama and his top aides quietly agonized over how to respond to Russia’s brazen intervention on behalf of the Donald Trump campaign without making matters worse. Weeks after Trump’s surprise victory, some of Obama’s aides looked back with regret and wished they had done more.
Now huddled in a private room on the sidelines of a meeting of world leaders in Lima, Peru, two months before Trump’s inauguration, Obama made a personal appeal to Zuckerberg to take the threat of fake news and political disinformation seriously. Unless Facebook and the government did more to address the threat, Obama warned, it would only get worse in the next presidential race.
Zuckerberg acknowledged the problem posed by fake news. But he told Obama that those messages weren’t widespread on Facebook and that there was no easy remedy, according to people briefed on the exchange, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share details of a private conversation.
The piece goes on to share that last Thursday, Zuckerberg and his team will hand over to Congress over 3,000 political ads that may have been part of the alleged Russian hack to manipulate the election results. Critics of Facebook say that the network did not do enough to address the deluge of politically charged and incorrect assessments, thus handing the election to Trump.
Facebook — once the darling of Silicon Valley, America and the world — is feeling rising heat and scrutiny everywhere it reaches:
Why it matters: If people think what they're reading on the social network might be fake, or that they may be being manipulated, that could be a massive long-term problem for a platform where ad revenue depends on keeping us happily addicted. A good experience is good for business.
Tech's Way Too Powerful
Welcome to the Jungle
Amazon's Fangs sinks its teeth into the Middle Class. Robert Reich's Multiplier - the algorithm that quantifies a companies true value or output to society - has cut its teeth on the Impact of Amazons Fangs (Facebook, Amazon, Net flix, Google and Samsung) with Middle's Price Slashing, Free Shipping and Interest Rate Cuts from the Great Recession's genius: Greenspan that keep inflation at a staggering rate.
Bottom line: we are destroying the soul of this nation and middle class "minority" for Convenience. Despite "Veblen Good" study after study show after 70K money no longer adds value to a family nor happiness. Making money sustainable is about a strong national economy not saving on consumer discretionary or clipping coupons. Income not outflow, Long term Investment not short term Investing, Sweat equity not the equity markets.
The polar opposite of what is happening.
And certainly not spending premium for Food and Energy is the focus now on the table from the tableau - big data speculative cutting block - to protectCore CPI and hedge on futures and commodities using proprietary Predictive Analytics and insider trading. Techniques like: laddering, spinning, and first buys all of the stock trading techniques learned during the first tech crash - the majority of which (almost 4 out of 5 ) whom Goldman was responsible for the majority of underwriting.
Its no secret that A 45% Gross Margin is a necessity in the world of E-Tailing when operating with showrooms. Shipping, Customer Service, Damages, Discounts and Overhead not to mention the need for Strong economic fundamentals like consumer purchasing power from housing and the Stock Markets.
Amazons 31% average and strategy to now leverage debt to break into the retail food market timely given historically low rates after 14 cuts to 1.67% from 0.97 in 2014 is more bad news. This environment is aligning even now Microsoft with Amazon's AI based on filling in the holes for Microsoft where they've lost share - cloud computing to AWS, Free Apps and Devices etc - actually have charged customers fair market price and have done great things as a result. They are becoming the too big to fail that is leveraging everyone and everything that has come before it with no scruples from a Corporate Ethics Perspective.
Can't we support those that support us? The Bill and Melinda gates foundation and Google finds cures for disease and tries to prolong life while compared to Amazon's donation of 500K (philanthropic write off) for Hurricane Harvey. Michael Dell gave 20 Million.
So How do the Average E-Tailer and Business Fight Back: Collect, Withdraw, Disturb and Disrupt.
The apparition of advanced interruption has rapidly turned out to be a standout amongst the most concerning issues for business pioneers far and wide. In 2015, short of what one percent of administrators accepted advanced disturbance could transformatively affect their industry. Presently, Airbnb is more significant than Hilton, Tesla is more profitable than Ford, General Motors and BMW, and Amazon's takeover of Whole Foods simply put enormous weight on contending basic supply chains' stocks.
These unmistakable cases have moved advanced disturbance from an optional worry to a best of-mind issue at the board level. As indicated by new research from the Global Center for Digital Business Transformation, a joint IMD and Cisco activity, more than seventy five percent of administrators now trust the effect of disturbance on their ventures will be "major" or "transformative." What a distinction two years can make.
Which ventures are generally powerless?
Administrators who thought – or still think – they are protected from disturbance will confront a severe shock. No industry is protected.
The media and media outlet is seeing the best interruption as the level of rivalry among industry officeholders strengthens on account of advances from Amazon, Facebook, Snapchat and Netflix.
Just marginally behind media are innovation items and administrations, retail, monetary administrations and broadcast communications. The organizations in these business sectors share a few attributes that make them especially presented to computerized interruption. For one, their center items and administrations are exceptionally data driven and can be promptly digitized.
In what capacity can organizations react to the powers of interruption?
In spite of the expanded mindfulness about computerized disturbance, 40 percent of study respondents still feel their pioneers don't comprehend the danger, or are reacting improperly. There is as yet a huge hole between recognizing the need to change and really accomplishing change.
At the point when confronted with a troublesome aggressive danger, it can be difficult to comprehend what to do in light of the fact that you are on new territory. In any case, four particular techniques can give a structure to conceptualize your alternatives.
This is a cautious procedure intended to augment picks up from a declining business or market. Domino's has been utilizing this strategy by driving more noteworthy efficiencies through advanced advances. Regardless of solid execution through the 1990s, Domino's battled in the right on time to mid 2000s. Notwithstanding, the organization's administration decided an online nearness that was both easy to understand and proficient could enhance the client experience and yield more deals. By 2015, the organization was preparing around half of all requests on the web, deals were 30 percent more than in store buys, and work costs diminished because of efficiencies made by the innovation.
The Harvest technique is tied in with amplifying an incentive in undermined portions. Be that as it may, when the expenses of keeping up a business plainly overwhelm the advantages, organizations should concentrate on key withdraw. This technique underscores withdrawal into a market specialty that serves a little subset of existing clients with specific needs. For instance, when General Electric confronted exceptional rivalry in its shopper apparatuses business, it shed GE Capital's benefits and sold its machines division – leaving a business that got $19.6 billion of every 2015, or about 17 percent of GE's aggregate income. GE is presently utilizing the returns of these deals to concentrate on its modern web system.
While Harvest and Retreat are guarded procedures, occupants can go into all out attack mode and progress toward becoming disruptors themselves. At the point when a market opportunity that can be gainfully misused is identified, organizations should concentrate on making new an incentive for clients utilizing computerized advancements and plans of action. Look no more remote than Otto for a case of a problematic methodology. The organization, which was as of late obtained by UBER, upsets the cargo business via mechanizing trucking. Right now, work speaks to 40 - 75 percent of operational expenses for the business. On the off chance that Otto can totally computerize its trucks, it will have the capacity to offer its administrations at a radically lessened cost and cut out the opposition.
In spite of the fact that the disturb methodology speaks to reactant exercises that present market interruption, the Occupy system concentrates on supporting the aggressive additions related with that disturbance. Involve rejects the "manufacture it and they will come" approach, and is prefaced on the truth that the organization that presents an interruption may not wind up winning at last. Walmart has utilized this system to prevail in retail. In the course of recent years, Walmart has put billions in multi-channel abilities to battle internet business contenders like Amazon. In executing this system, Walmart's stores turned into a key resource as almost 90% of Americans live inside ten miles of one.
The pace of interruption is quickening crosswise over businesses because of quicker computerized innovation development cycles, a blast of very much supported new companies and the rise of Chinese mammoths, for example, Alibaba, Tencent and Baidu. Computerized change requires activity. Simply discussing computerized change, enlisting a boss advanced officer or beginning a "development center point" won't spare your business. A genuine, comprehensive change to your plan of action is expected to survive and flourish in the computerized period. The ideal opportunity for vital activity is presently – in light of the fact that nobody realizes what the following two years will bring.
50 Slates of Grey
The Years of Magical Thinking
Many have at least heard of Orson Wells renowned broadcast of War of the Worlds . The supposed attack on the US by foreign invaders, later rebroadcast in Ecuador, led to several (very real ) deaths. Decades later, MTV’s Real World marked the beginning of “reality” TV and was a huge hit leading to a second & third season that eventually kicked off block-buster hits like “Keeping up with the Kardashians”, “The Real Housewives”, and the ridiculous Jersey Shit Show, “Jersey Shore”. Then the thriller “Blair Witch Project” that shook up many despite clearly being a studio production for entertainment purposes only. Obviously, many still refused to believe that it was fake. Alas, the new American Pastime Suspension of Disbelief has expanded our worlds as we entered into theirs. We love to belie and bask in fictitious words and fantasy worlds - escapism bound alive and well slate side as we paint it darker and bleaker ..
Enter Convergence Culture and Big Data. The most powerful convergence of Tech, Marketing and the Mediums that’s powering the Orwellian phenomenon is at its peak. Now Software Platforms like Storify, Taley and Flipboard which allows the end user to natively create Magazine Book Marking Type Projects and Slip in or “Flip” articles - like Pinterest have viral sway in certain social circles. In essence, creating Fake Views or perceived news is now the answer to Real News albeit a watered down telephone chain’s claims of legitamacy bruises air ways on the side of personal social protection rather than vital real societal projection. How is all this relevant? At a point where fantasy mimes meet virtual lives - supplemental reality has become the Norm. Filling in the Blanks by Total Recalling of Fragments of disparate information and events like War of the Worlds, the Real World excites, invites and completes ours.
Indecent Proposals - Pushing the Terms. Limits.
Anastastized State Side
Raking in a ton at the box office, a new kind of love dominated our affections this Valentine’s Day rather than a mere box of chocolates. Its fame the sleasey 50 Shades of Grey.. The loving story where Tycoon and Mogul Christian Grey bachelor pines for the affection of Anastasia Steele by courting her into new territory through ultimate Male Domination. Privilege through pain.. Pushing the limits of her traditional fuse, he attempts to ignite the humdrum with Sado-Masochism, kinky sets, and photo yachts (see “your name here” hello propster) to the likes of big toys, for big boys the mega wealth seduction and kinky sex, pushing her to and past the limits. In Indecent Proposal fashion, we see this hue Prince Harming Story unfold in the new American Corporate Governance. The Dungeons and Domains of the emerging virtual realities made manifest itself as we take a walk on the “wild” side of striking the irons while they're hot. Boredom meets Boardroom, Tycoon meets Typhoon, and into the perverse real worlds of the fictitous Anastasia Steele your Arch awaits, just wait.. The narrative in its namesake “Anastasia” the Eastern European Russian confounding a Fantasy twirl; all things to all people, real , based on fake lore and trusting the fantasy just begging to be resold in children stories (Disney’s Anastasia) bounded in historical relevancy - the Real Anastasia that was gagged and found dead that is westward bound. The new American Sweet Arch being sold at a theatre for two.. .
Paint it Black - First Wives Club
Looks that Kill. Melania Gore Complex
Ultimately, she can’t win.. literally and figuratively. Shady, Grey, Sadist or Masochist - fiend and foe. The Crook Hillary parallels our imaginations most negative portrayals of the Patron "Satan" Anastasia tempted to eat the forbidden fruit.. The Curious Female that opens Pandora's Locks. Lock Her Up the curious solution by bounding and Gagging or keeping her away from the male (or mail bot). Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna of Russia was the youngest daughter of Tsar Nicholas II. The last sovereign of Imperial Russia and his wife, Tsarina Alexandra Fyodorovna were assisnated when mixed reports claim her royalty and in fast KGB format she was also murdered at Yekaterinburg on July 17, 1918 with her family in an extrajudicial killing by members of the Cheka, the Bolshevik secret police.
The tragedy and story lives on through not only Disney Films “A spellbinding mix of adventure , comedy , rowmance (tongue in sleek) and music. This acclaimed animated spectacular tells the THRILLING story of the lost Russian Princess Anastasia and her quest to find her true Identity. Sounds Familar for potential wrecker of Hillary - Billary? After the Death of Anastasia the (Wanna Please) wannabes showed up in droves claiming to be the real Anastasia. “And when the shadows of the revolution fall across Russia, the royal family's youngest daughter barely escapes with her own life.. That being the cartoon Typhoon is Met ultimately by the Evil RasPuTin.
50 Grades of Shadey Anastasia falls to maybe not Putin or Rasputin but to the spoils of extreme comfort of the Lifestyle and the spotlight - The Spoils, the trophy wives, kids and the trophy lives and lions head bounty on a platter, unworthy and scarce - for how could anyone succcumb to the temptations offered by such Perjury at a time when America’s First Caste Clashes. White Dominance and the tales of soul-less.. The Vilification of her seen through the eyes of the Puritans on witch hunts. Web Sites that say she's a Satanist - It's varied mixed messages right out of the subconscious and from earlier times. the Socially Daring and Staring we all Wish for and despise. We love to talk about the trainwreck especially when it involves drama for drama’s stake , the wish fufillment not yet filled and the view American Steamy dreamy.
In the context of this prominence, privilege and pronouncements, the Selection of 2016 for Resident in the White House - Hillary is the target of ridicule no matter what she does. The sad wife if she stays, the sad window of oppourtunism we’ve never seen the likes of on lets Face Book.. Review the History. The real stunt Melania may be the Glitz and Glamour one who is taking it for the Steam. However, the real struck is Hillary who is a beat up proxy for the dirty Anastasia who is taking a real beating no matter what she does. After Wall Crooked Billary can’t make up her Mimes what she stood for. People teasing and a pleaser a sign of a “desperate housewife” Willie and wearing all those hats and pantsuits really no “next top model” after labouring all day keeping up with the lies inherent in standing by your man - a sure fire way to annoy sharpshooters from Russia’s Bend - Guise She... And transparent the secretive shyster confidante confident women who’s real love Character lies not only when appropriate for Country First, but when standing by her Man when true love gets invested. Divorce five times quick and sleezy ala 50 ways not for anyone who cares deeply about Family First as for our sensitivity for, True Lies detection heeds to pay more attention to the real world and the dilemma of truth in politics, love and real loyalty - through thick and skin - and the complex connections and soul of it all.